No Start Sky Arrow

[FastEddieB]

There seems to have recently been a rash or starting problems.

 

To avoid confusion, I thought I'd spin off my particular case.

 

Already posted to the other thread:

 

Interestingly, I just got back from the airport.

Had a BFR (for me) scheduled for tomorrow, and I just wanted to check the fuel and make sure the plane would start.

It wouldn't. Crank and crank and crank. Choke and no choke. No throttle and full throttle. Suspected flooding so fuel valve off, full throttle, crank and crank and crank - not so much as a sputter. Pulled 2 plugs. Top was dry, bottom only a tad damp.

On the bright side, my Aerovolz lithium iron battery spun the engine with authority throughout. When I was done, I stuck it on a battery tender which showed "Full Charge". I checked it and it's still at 12.99v after all that cranking.

I do have the BullyHawk module. 

In any case, I'll try again in the morning and ket you guys know what happens.

 

• • •

 

Yesterday, still nothing after sitting overnight. Cranked for a while with fuel off and full throttle - still nothing. Pulled the cowling and hooked up a spark plug like so:

 

 

In daylight, a friend said he could see no spark when cranking.

 

Looked at two plugs, and again the top was dry and the bottom only slightly damp.

 

Went ahead and tried some Roger Lee voodoo for about 30 minutes:

 

 

Nothing initially. But on the second cranking the cranking power fell off suddenly and I was showing 8v. Don't know if that's typical of lithium iron but the fall-off was dramatic. I believe a lithium iron battery can be damaged if the voltage falls too low, so I packed it in for the day.

 

Put the battery on a charger overnight. Will try the voodoo one more time in the next few days. 

 

I seem to be getting fuel, but may pull the float bowls out of general principle and check the jets.

 

Next step may be to take the BullyHawk out of the system.

 

Any other suggestions? As an aside, except when I've had a marginal battery starting has never been an issue.

 

I'm just wondering if I should go ahead and order the new modules. If they are better and older ones are failing over time, it might make sense to bite the bullet now, even if that does not turn out to be my issue.

[WmInce]

I appreciate all the posts on this, problems as well as solutions.

Far as I'm concerned, it is only a matter of time, before I and others will be faced with same dilemma.

[S4Flier]

Eddie -- the mechanic that works on my plane has had 3-4 LSA's with ignition module troubles and rigged up a pretty simple test.  He pulls a couple of the spark plug cables of and attaches a peak voltage meter to the connection.  I then crank it and the voltmeter should capture a non-zero reading of the spark if its good.  Each time he's determined the modules were bad, Lockwood confirmed with their fancy tester.  Absent a voltmeter than captures the peak, you could probably enlist an onlooker to see if the display registers anything while you crank it.

[Doug G.]

So Rotax has offered replacement for fuel pumps. (I wonder how many of them have been bad.) Are these modules rising to the same level?

[S4Flier]

Roger -- I'm not following how this could actually damage the module. He didn't pull the plug but removed the plug wire.  The probe is in contact with the plug wire connector and is grounded.  No open circuit and the voltmeter provides resistance.  Am I missing something?

[S4Flier]

Wire is off the plug but it is connected to a grounded probe -- no open circuit.

[Flying Bozo]

Regarding the non starting issue. I have experienced that two times an the second time I think I have a theory as to what is going on. First time was when I was away for 3 weeks and the plane was not run, Upon return the engine would turn vigorously but would not fire. After several trys at starting I pushed it back into the hangar and checked the battery voltage, 12.7 volts. I put the charger on it anyway since I figured that I had somewhat depleted the battery with the starting attempts. So next morning I was ready to do some trouble shooting but instead tried starting it. It started right off. So I thought I must have flooded it the day before while trying to start it. Everything was alright on starting for the next month until I let it sit again for a while

 

 I was out of town for four weeks and the plane sat  and I experienced the same problem. The engine would turn over vigorously (I thought) but again no firing at all. So I repeated the process of the overnight charge and in the morning it started right up. But I did notice that it was turning over more vigorously than it did the day before.

 

I consulted with a friend who has had a fair amount of experience with the Rotax 912 and he thought that it was a case of the engine needing a minimum of about 360 RPM to create a spark. And as I mentioned, after the overnight charge the cranking was a bit more vigorous and the engine started right up, no problem.

 

So here is what I think happened. There is a problem in one of the 6 cells that is not showing up under a no load voltage test but when demanding a high current to start it is not putting out the current it should. This leaves the engine to crank on 5 cells which is does very nicely. But cranking with that lesser voltage does not surpass the critical RPM needed to create the spark.

 

So I would suggest that even if you think that the cranking is sufficient to start it but it won't start then jumper it with good connections and and try it. 

 

If the scenario had not happened twice in exactly the same manner then I would still be in the dark but after the same thing happened twice it is apparent that the battery is the problem. The battery is 4 years old, and apparently still good enough on the remaining good cells to crank the engine at what looks like a reasonable RPM. But after the battery charge up the higher cranking RPM was readily apparent.

 

Now that I am running it a couple times a week still with the old battery and  there has been no further problems with starting.

 

So I have a new battery on the way and thanks to Tim (CT4ME) I was able to get the discount that he got on his more than a year ago with the discount code that he has in his posting here.

 

Larry

[Flying Bozo]

Roger, you are so right, I was pulling my hair out trying to figure out what was wrong, and, the next call was going to be to you!! But as I said the next morning after the battery charge it started right up now that the battery was full charge and able to turn over the engine at the proper RPM. It is hard to tell that the battery might not be up to snuff just by checking the standing voltage, it looks good but under starting load it was not.

 

After two time this happened I am tuned into the battery and the RPM thing. 

 

Larry

[FastEddieB]

Mine is cranking like crazy - pretty sure that's not it.

 

But a possible hint...

 

The BullyHawk modules senses starter voltage and on my plane retards the spark on IGN2.

 

Hence, it calls for starting on IGN2 only.

 

First start of the day, that usually hasn't worked for some time. I have to turn both ignitions on. Subsequent starts are fine on IGN2 the rest of the day.

 

Maybe IGN2 took a "starting" dump some time ago, mandating IGN1 get involved. And now IGN1 is problematical as well?

 

My inclination is to bite the bullet and order new modules.

 

Sigh.

[S4Flier]

Just think of the weight savings going from 3 devices to 2

[FastEddieB]

.4 lbs. saved.

 

 

Woo Hoo!

[WmInce]

. . . "If you think the modules are bad just send them to Lockwood." . . .

Best advice I've heard so far.

[FastEddieB]

Spoke with Dean at Lockwood.

 

1) He said the best way to check for spark was a timing light with inductive pickup. I do have a timing light, but not inductive. I checked at O'Reilly's, NAPA and Advance, and that's not something any of them loan out, but a cheap model is only $40. I may pick one up later - not much need for timing stuff anymore, but could be handy to have just to test for spark conveniently.

 

2) He said since both modules retard the spark on startup, they should both be on, so no modification of a CT's ignition circuitry should be necessary, other than two wires to the starter solenoid. With individual switches, I'd be back to both ON for startup.

 

Will check for spark one way or another and decide from there what to do.

[Runtoeat]

Eddie, will an inductive tachometer work?  Thinking this might read cranking rpm if there's spark?  I've got a Snap-On inductive tachometer.  If you find this will work, you pay for shipping and it's your's to use.

[FastEddieB]

Eddie, will an inductive tachometer work?  Thinking this might read cranking rpm if there's spark?  I've got a Snap-On inductive tachometer.  If you find this will work, you pay for shipping and it's your's to use.

Thanks for the offer.

 

I have a $5 off coupon, so the timing light would be down to $35, plus it could be a handy diagnostic tool for future projects.

 

Thanks again!

[FastEddieB]

No, but as I said, its got plenty of ooomph.

 

Its turning over more than rapidly enough to start.

 

I'm camping with the wife at Sea Level North Carolina right now. More troubleshooting will have to wait until I get home.

[FastEddieB]

Fuel - check

Air - check

Spark - Aye, there's the rub!

[FastEddieB]

I went ahead and bought the $40 inductive timing light at O'Reilly's and got the $5 off.

 

Tested it on Karen's Jeep*, and it definitely works and is very bright.

 

Just got back from the airport. Tried it on both the top and bottom plug wires to cylinder 3. Zilch. Nada. Nothing.

 

Probably going to go ahead in the morning and order up the new modules. Hopefully that will work and I can have the old ones tested to confirm they're bad. 

 

Any thoughts before I pull the trigger?

 

 

*Interestingly, that's our only vehicle with "normal" and easily reachable plug wires. They don't make it easy any more!

[Runtoeat]

Fast Eddie, Keep us posted.  I've got a 2006 CT and, based on all the bad reports, I'm now on a "module death watch" for my plane.

[S4Flier]

Eddie -- suggest you call CPS on the west coast since they only have a couple left in their order of 6 due sometime next week.  You can always cancel or send it back unopened.  I understand there is a 6-8 week lead time on these if they aren't in stock which neither Leading Edge or Lockwood had.

[FastEddieB]

Lockwood did have some last week.

 

They were the ones that suggested the timing light.

 

I'll let you know what they say in the morning.

[FastEddieB]

OK,

 

I spoke with Billy Payne of Just Aircraft, to see if he would help me troubleshoot before ordering the new modules.

 

He said if it was his plane, he would order the new modules regardless. He said whenever they got in a plane with the old modules, they replaced them as a matter of course.

 

So I called Lockwood, and they are in fact out of stock. Some due in soon but some ahead of me for backorders.

 

Called CPS and they suggested I speak with Kevin, who gets in at 11A.

 

Is this the item I want?

 

http://www.cps-parts.com/catalog/rtxpages/15-05952.php?clickkey=1664996

 

Also apparently back ordered. I know I'll need two, but if that's the right part it will come in cheaper than Lockwood - $640 for two instead of $940.

[FastEddieB]

I now have modules on order from both Lockwood and CPS. CPS says they have some due in on 8/18 and not yet spoken for. A bit more - $995 as opposed to $940.

 

I will just cancel the second order as soon as the first ships.

 

To be continued...

[Tip]

What did you find out with the $640 price?

[FastEddieB]

That was apparently the BullyHawk module.