FlyingMonkey Posted June 21, 2017 Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 Hey all... At the end of the Summer, I'm planning to Pull the wings on my 2007 CTSW (E-LSA) and replace the sight tubes, which are starting to get brown and less easy to read. It occurs to me that while the wings are off, now might be a good time to enable the AoA function of the Dynon D100 I have in my cockpit. I'd basically have to run a second pitot line alongside the current one from the pitot boom to the D100, and swap out the pitot boom itself for an AoA version (Dynon Part #10-02789). I will probably have to bore out the pitot hole in the wing a bit to accept the larger diameter boom. Total cost for all parts would be around $250 or less. If anybody has done this or something similar, and knows of any issues or "gotchas" with doing this, I'd love to hear about it. I do feel this is not a necessary upgrade, as I've never had any AoA or stall warning in my CT and never had any issue without it. But it seems a pretty cheap and easy operation, and it's always annoyed me that the D100 has AoA built-in and I've never been able to use it. I can also set the D100 to send audio alerts based on AoA (just beeping when you get close to critical AoA), I'm not sure if I will tackle making that work with the rest of the audio in the airplane. I have a friend who used to be an Navy avionics tech on Hornets though, so he can probably set me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Cesnalis Posted June 21, 2017 Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 I don't do my own maintenance so excuse if a dumb question. Will wing removal for sight tube replacement and attachment point inspection give you the access you need to route a pitot tube through the wing? Is there the possibility that you can fasten a double tube to the existing single and then pull it through without gaining access? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anticept Posted June 21, 2017 Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 The tubes have layups holding them in place in some areas. You'll have to run it quite a ways through all sorts of nooks and crannies. As for the beeps: you have to make sure an audio wire is run from the EFIS to the intercomm. This wasn't done in many SWs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Lee Posted June 21, 2017 Report Share Posted June 21, 2017 HI Andy, It really isn't retrofittable. You have what you have for a pitot tube. You haven't crashed yet so why do you think you need one? If you have to hear alarms to know you are going to stall you've already made mistakes that should never have happened and evidently haven't happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Baker Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 I would talk to John Hurst, or maybe call Lockwood. I know they have done one before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 3 hours ago, Roger Lee said: HI Andy, It really isn't retrofittable. You have what you have for a pitot tube. You haven't crashed yet so why do you think you need one? If you have to hear alarms to know you are going to stall you've already made mistakes that should never have happened and evidently haven't happened. Roger, like I said, not a "must have"...just an annoyance that the capability is there but not used. If it's an enormous hassle I won't do it, but if it can be done with a few hours' work, then why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 14 minutes ago, Tom Baker said: I would talk to John Hurst, or maybe call Lockwood. I know they have done one before. Thanks Tom! I asked Lockwood about it when they did my very first annual 4 years ago, I can't remember why we didn't do it. They either told me it was a huge amount of work and thus money, or it would take too much time (since I was staying at a hotel). I'll call them and report back their response. I don't know John Hurst, but I have CT friends who know him, so I can get his number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 6 hours ago, Ed Cesnalis said: I don't do my own maintenance so excuse if a dumb question. Will wing removal for sight tube replacement and attachment point inspection give you the access you need to route a pitot tube through the wing? Is there the possibility that you can fasten a double tube to the existing single and then pull it through without gaining access? Those are good questions I don't have answers to yet. The "double pull through" you mentioned was what I was thinking as a last resort if I could not route a line by itself, but it's risky (if a line gets stuck or dropped halfway through you are f***ed) and if the original line is really laid up inside or tightly routed it won't work. I also don't know about room and access. Still just in the investigative stages of such a project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 4 hours ago, Anticept said: The tubes have layups holding them in place in some areas. You'll have to run it quite a ways through all sorts of nooks and crannies. As for the beeps: you have to make sure an audio wire is run from the EFIS to the intercomm. This wasn't done in many SWs. Thanks Corey. I don't mind a long run, but I don't want to interfere with any controls or do anything crazy. No "hillbilly engineering". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anticept Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 It's not that it would interfere... it's that this is a very difficult thing you are trying to do. It would be a project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ls6pilot Posted June 22, 2017 Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 Andy, Still not available but that ilevil bom is supposed to be available soon. Maybe by oshkosh. Not only aoa but also pitot static to a tablet for backup indicated airspeed etc. Pretty neat. (More that your project but a lot easier) Attaches to inspection port under wing. http://nebula.wsimg.com/1ef3835a2c77b6b596f7809af439f75f?AccessKeyId=25B2510C35AB96A7E02E&disposition=0&alloworigin=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted June 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2017 Rich, I don't want to spend a large amount of money on an AoA solution. I'm just looking to activate the existing AoA function of my Dynon, if it's not terribly difficult to do. If it's very hard, I'll just skip it; my airplane has not fallen out of the sky yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hambone Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 I'm curious why AOA isn't used more for approaches and landing. Coming from a military background, using AOA for approach and landing speeds was very useful. No final approach speeds to compute, as AOA is independent of weight, bank angle or CG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmi Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 I think the way we fly LSA planes , your basic airspeed ( and the associated sound/feel) of the plane is a very good proxy for the AOA value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Baker Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 Actually the CT more than any other airplane I have flown is hard to judge speed by sound and feel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmi Posted May 18, 2018 Report Share Posted May 18, 2018 I understand that but within the performance envelope typical sport ( or private pilots for that matter ) fly , slow flight or departure type stall, is pretty much the only time they will approach really high AOA setups ... is it not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madhatter Posted May 19, 2018 Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 The CTSW pitot tube runs thru a plastic tube and stiff shielded wire can be run thru it ( I have done it ), however there is a grommet at the wing root so you have to pull the wing out a little. I don't see a need for an AOA on this aircraft as it has the best stall characteristics of any plane I have ever flown and you have to be very inattentive to stall this plane. I suppose if you do, it will just kill you slower than other planes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Lee Posted May 19, 2018 Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 I don't see a need for an AoA either. I have looked into installing a different pitot tube for the AoA and it was not going to work out because of the structure and metal tubing inside the existing pitot tube area. You may open a can of worms you can't put back in the can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted May 19, 2018 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 Roger, I kind of came to a similar conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandpiper Posted May 19, 2018 Report Share Posted May 19, 2018 The AOA for the RV-12 looks like a static port and is placed on the underside of the wing a few inches aft of the leading edge. Completely separate from the pitot. Maybe it could be done on the CT? Why separate from the pitot you may ask? Because the -12 has the pitot in the prop hub. Why in the prop hub? Because Van's designed it so the wings would be easily removable for trailering and garage storage. I bet if you polled all the owners you would find 99% of them only take the wings off because it is required at annual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iaw4 Posted August 26, 2019 Report Share Posted August 26, 2019 updated link for "The BOM": https://shop.levil.com/products/bom-with-adsb?variant=120422727706 . Price about $1600 to $2000. not cheap. No pilot should die in a stall near ground without an AoA indicator, either, but it happens all the time. Ergo, I think with good warning indication, I could imagine an AoA could be a useful warning aid. FD has added AoA to newer airplanes, and many military aircraft require it. In a sense, I wonder---given an equal-cost choice between an IAS and an AoA, would I prefer the former or the latter? (I always have GS from GPS, anyway.) [given $2,000 and more drag otoh, I prefer the existing IAS] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted August 26, 2019 Report Share Posted August 26, 2019 It doesn't matter what kind of indication and warning system you have, if you loose situational awareness and stop flying your airplane, you're just as dead. That said, if I had an AOA indicator, I'd certainly use it. As mentioned, it'll give you good info regardless of weight that you can use in takeoff, landing, and cruise. Being Navy trained, I can testify that AOA is your friend if properly utilized. It enables precise control of lift and, just as important for coming aboard, helps keep tight bounds on aircraft attitude and therefore tailhook angle to help you catch those all important wires. In the F-14, there was an AOA gauge type indicator (the Navy uses the term "units of AOA") and the lighted chevron indicator (fast, on speed, slow or yellow/green/red) that the pilots use coming aboard. That said, there was some slop between colors (maybe about a five knot range) and a few of the pilots I flew with would have me (as a backseater) call airspeeds (either a number above or below the on-speed reference or actual airspeed..like 133) to help them spot trends so they could make corrections early and avoid not only getting off but having the chevron change color which the LSO on the ship who's grading their pass could see. In light aircraft, the weight influence is the most compelling argument, with accelerated stall warning being the next more important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmi Posted August 26, 2019 Report Share Posted August 26, 2019 IAS serves other purposes than just being a stall proxy. I have flown with AOA indicator during my training for about 30 hours and I don’t remember ever looking at it. These days , having logged about 200 hours in my plane, I rely on the feel of the plane, IAS , noise etc - all of these give me pretty good indication if I am getting close to the edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted August 26, 2019 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2019 2 hours ago, Andy said: It doesn't matter what kind of indication and warning system you have, if you loose situational awareness and stop flying your airplane, you're just as dead. This. Use what you got and don't be asleep at the stick. If you're paying attention and really flying the airplane, you should not be caught by surprise by the airplane's behavior unless there is a mechanical failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.