Jump to content

Fuel usage


Razorback Flyer

Recommended Posts

Your slip/skid ball is a little off.  You can't see your nose its easy to be fooled.

Check your ball against your sight tube in flight, with rudder in put find the middle between the fuel going up and down and use that for an adjustment for a centered ball.

Manage your fuel in flight with rudder trim, fuel follows the ball, you can correct the burn by adjusting the ball position a slight amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ed Cesnalis said:

Manage your fuel in flight with rudder trim, fuel follows the ball, you can correct the burn by adjusting the ball position a slight amount.

You've been saying that for years and I find it is still one of the best pieces of advice a new CT owner can scour from this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Ed, fuel may be transferring from the wing that is slightly high in straight and level flight to the wing that is slightly low in straight and level flight. This can happen if the slip-skid ball is not perfectly rigged and it makes sense to check for this problem (which results in non-level wings when the ball is centered). I had this problem with my CTsw and the first step my mechanic took was to ensure that the ball was properly rigged (i.e., that the ball was centered when the wings were level). This was done on the ground and not in the air.  My ball was not rigged correctly and after it was fixed I had equal fuel levels in the tanks at the end of long flights.  

There are dozens of posts on this issue on CTFlier that can be found with a search of the forum.  There are other possibilities, e.g., a kink in a fuel line, a clogged strainer on the pick-up in a wing tank, poor tank venting, etc.  Still, I suspect that many would agree that checking the rig of the ball is a smart start.  

I am not a mechanic and my comments are not intended to be maintenance recommendations or guidance.  They re provided only for discussion purposes, only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Runtoeat said:

Ed, I don't see anyone taking the bait on your last statement yet.........................maybe most are still cogitating on it, like me.  :rolleyes:

Dick,

Its not bait so much as evolution.  I've landed with an empty wing more times than I can count so I know it is reasonable to use left, right or both just like my Cessna.

I'm routinely climbing to 13,000' and above so keeping it light or minimum fuel helps.  I have unported my remaining wing when maneuvering near steep terrain at 13,000 and it was exhilarating.  In a heartbeat I was knife-edged and descending 2,000 fpm to make the terrain a non-issue while I sorted it out.

It just occurred to me that we have this expectation of both sides dropping in unison from top to bottom but that's not how the design works.  Both sides have a minimum flow they are not tuned to match.  I started feeling silly flying around just a bit crooked because I expect matching flow rates and I was making sure I was getting matching flow rates.

It doesn't take much 'lee side chop' to make my sight tubes un-readable and my fuel unmanageable anyway.  Under 2 hours of fuel I'm clueless if there's both chop and low light and just resort to basic math like I used to do with other models.  I was recently unable to confirm any fuel at all so I just flew with my nose in the wind and when I landed all the fuel was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...