Jump to content

Two prop strikes ?


procharger

Recommended Posts

The gearbox should have been sent in to check for internal damage and a warpped prop flange. The crankshaft should have had its run out checked to see if it was tweaked and see if the crankshaft was twisted. All this should have been in the logbook. If it isn't it's just another prime example of sloppy work. If it isn't logged as being done I'd walk away. A fix here would be very expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checking the run out is fairly simple. You need a good dial indicator, and it needs to be done while the gearbox is removed.

The crankshaft on the 912 is not a solid piece of metal like most crankshafts. It is pressed together from 5 pieces if I remember correctly. It is not real common, but it can twist where it is pressed together. Here is a preview on the check.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All engines before 2003 came without clutches unless you ordered it that way. Then in 2003 Kodiak that imports into the US started ordering all 912ULS engines with clutches. 

Even with a clutch things can be bent and tweaked. The clutch just helps, but it can still happen. Usually depends on prop rpm, type of prop and type of prop strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We are probably a bit lucky using Rotax engines. A friend of mine had his Mooney grounded for a full strip and inspect because the mechanic did not like the grass stains on the prop, called it a prop strike. Cost thousands of $$$. At least the Rotax gearbox inspection is easy and not expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Anticept said:

You can get grass stains on a mooney prop operating on a grass strip easy. Those props pull grass up without even touching.

I would have told them to give it a 43.11(b) and found someone else.

They are in Australia, not sure our rules apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom the problem is that there is a serious shortage of capable mechanics so you are at their mercy. It is not so easy to just "take it some where else".

Also your system allows the operator to make some decisions on what maintenance to have done ours does not.

At least I suspect that we win the flag for the worst general aviation regulator. The US regulator seems to encourage aviation. Our system is hell bent on grounding as many pilots as possible 'cause if no one is flying there will be no accidents. Even traditional flying schools are getting hard to find.

We have gone from about 60,000 current GA pilots to about a quarter of that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...